By Mark Joseph Antonius Knippenberg / ScepraX.
Status: Theoretical framework. One instantiation of the PseudoScience Speelgoed at the scale of populations, communities, and ecosystems. It does not compete with ecology or evolutionary biology. It tests whether the Speelgoed’s mechanism, supplied with values from those fields, reproduces what they already know, and it says plainly where it does not.
Ecology is the science of bonds between living things: who eats whom, who helps whom, who lives inside whom. Its Lichaam (🖕) is a population, a community, or a whole ecosystem, and its Koppels are interactions between species. Of all the Octaven, this one deals most directly with the Speelgoed’s own subject, bonds that form, hold, cascade, and end, without the intimacy of the neuroscience Octaaf.
Like the other Octaven, this document is an Instantie (⚙). It supplies the open parameters of §VIII.7 with values taken from science, then checks whether the shape the Speelgoed fixes survives. Where the two disagree, the disagreement is reported in §4 rather than smoothed over.
Four features set this Octaaf apart:
Every mapping carries one of five grades, defined as in the other Octaven.
| Grade | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Identity | The Speelgoed equation and the scientific model are the same equation under a stated substitution of symbols. |
| Constraint | The science fixes, bounds, or forbids a choice the Speelgoed leaves open to its Instantie. |
| Correspondence | Same structure and same qualitative behaviour, but no shared equation. |
| Tension | The Speelgoed as written conflicts with established findings. A repair is proposed. |
| Open | Not resolved. |
An Identity shows that the Speelgoed uses the same mathematics as the science at this Octaaf. That is a test of consistency, not evidence that the Speelgoed explains more than the science already does. Which quantity a Speelgoed term is mapped to is also a choice, and the same term may map to different quantities at different Octaven.
Quotations. Quotations from the Speelgoed leave out its bold markup and the symbols it puts in brackets after a term. Otherwise they are verbatim.
References. References such as §II or §VIII.1 point to the PseudoScience Speelgoed. References such as §2.1 point to sections of this document. References to companion entries are written in full, for example Thermodynamic Octaaf §2.3.
| Speelgoed (section) | Value at this Octaaf | Grade | Here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drempel θ and Marge η (§II; Lexicon) | Alternative stable states with hysteresis | Correspondence (measured) | §2.1 |
| Flicker before a crossing (Thermodynamic Octaaf §2.3) | Early-warning signals: slowing down, rising variance, flickering | Correspondence (measured) | §2.2 |
| Van Motor, ν = ν₀·exp(−J) (§III) | Extinction time exponential in population size under member-level noise; power law under shared shocks | Identity (form) + Constraint | §2.3 |
| Greep from bonds with one’s own kind | The Allee effect: a density below which a population declines | Correspondence (measured) | §2.4 |
| “A deep bond is not a safe one” (§III) | May’s limit: more and stronger links destabilise | Constraint | §2.5 |
| Trouw y (§II) | Signed interaction strengths; signs need not match | Correspondence (this Octaaf) | §3.1 |
| Masker (§VII; Lexicon) | Batesian mimicry; honest warning signals as Bloot | Correspondence | §3.2 |
| Parasiet (Lexicon; §XVI) | Brood parasitism (the cuckoo) | Correspondence (measured) | §3.3 |
| Creatie (§VI, §VIII.5) | Reproduction from surplus beyond maintenance | Correspondence | §3.4 |
| Scale invariance (§V.2) | Endosymbiosis; the lichen as a Trio | Correspondence | §3.5 |
| Doem (§III; Lexicon) | Trophic cascades and coextinction | Correspondence (measured) | §3.6 |
| Rouw (§VI) | Evolutionary anachronisms; the “ghost of competition past” | Correspondence | §3.7 |
| Diepte (§II, §VIII.1) | Ecological memory: weighted effects of past conditions | Correspondence | §3.8 |
| Zweven (§VI) and the Van Motor’s constancy | The Red Queen: constant extinction risk regardless of age | Correspondence | §3.9 |
| A slow fall (§VIII.1) | Extinction debt | Correspondence | §3.10 |
| Trinary Root (§III) | Producers (Vol), decomposers (Leeg), nutrient cycles (Medium) | Correspondence | §3.11 |
| Tijd (Lexicon) | No mapping attempted | Open | §5 |
Many ecosystems can exist in two alternative states under the same conditions. Shallow lakes are the best-studied case. As nutrients are added, a clear lake with rooted plants stays clear for a long time, then abruptly turns turbid and dominated by algae. Reducing the nutrients again does not restore it at the same level; it must be pushed much further back before it returns to clear (Scheffer et al. 2001). Coral reefs, dryland vegetation and fisheries show the same pattern.
The underlying mathematics was set out early. In a simple model of a resource grazed by consumers, the resource can have two stable levels separated by an unstable one, and slowly changing a parameter makes the system jump between them at two different points (May 1977). Between those points, both states are possible, and which one the system is in depends on its history.
In Speelgoed terms this is a Drempel with a Marge, the “dead band around a Drempel that prevents flickering crossings” (Lexicon). The thermodynamic Octaaf found that a Marge of finite width corresponds to a first-order transition, and that the smooth pitchfork of §VIII.3 is the limit in which the Marge narrows to nothing (Thermodynamic Octaaf §2.3). Ecological regime shifts have a wide Marge. Grade: Correspondence (measured).
The thermodynamic Octaaf predicted that a system approaching a Drempel recovers more and more slowly from disturbances, and that its fluctuations grow (Thermodynamic Octaaf §2.3). Ecologists independently developed these signs as early warnings of critical transitions: rising autocorrelation, rising variance, and slower recovery (Scheffer et al. 2009). They have been observed in nature and in experiments:
That last finding sharpens the Speelgoed. A Marge “prevents flickering crossings” only if it is wide compared with the disturbances the Medium delivers. When disturbances are large enough to kick the system across the Marge, it flickers. A Marge holds against flicker only to the extent that its width exceeds the Medium’s noise. Grade: Correspondence (measured), with a refinement.
The Van Motor’s rate is ν = ν₀·exp(−J) (§III, §VIII.1). For a population, the fall is extinction. Lande’s analysis of extinction risk distinguishes sources of chance (Lande 1993):
The second result is a limit on Greep that the Speelgoed does not state. Exponential protection holds only against shocks that strike members independently. Against shocks that strike everyone at once, numbers protect much less. A large, well-bound population is exponentially safe from bad luck and only polynomially safe from a bad year. The neuroscience Octaaf found a related route from exponential to power-law behaviour, through a spread of Greep across memories (Neuroscience Octaaf §2.5). Here the route is the Medium’s shared noise.
In many species, individuals do worse when there are too few of their own kind. They struggle to find mates, defend against predators, or feed cooperatively. Below a critical density, a population’s growth rate turns negative and it declines toward extinction. Above it, the population grows. This is the strong Allee effect (Courchamp, Clutton-Brock & Grenfell 1999). The evidence for it, reviewed across many taxa, is substantial (Kramer et al. 2009).
In Speelgoed terms, the critical density is a Drempel, and the reason it exists is Greep: the bonds a member has with others of its kind. Too few bonds, and the Van Motor wins. Below the threshold the decline feeds itself: fewer members means fewer bonds, and fewer bonds means faster decline. That is Doem as a cascade, “the cascade of Verlies that strips a node of every Greep” (Lexicon). Grade: Correspondence (measured).
In 1972 Robert May asked whether larger, more connected ecosystems are more stable. He found the opposite for randomly assembled communities. A community of S species, with a fraction C of possible links present and typical link strength σ, is almost surely unstable once σ·√(S·C) exceeds 1 (May 1972). Adding species, adding links, or strengthening them all push it toward instability.
Later work showed that the kind of link matters. Predator–prey pairs, where one partner gains and the other loses, are stabilising. Competition and mutualism, where both partners are affected in the same direction, are destabilising (Allesina & Tang 2012). Many weak links also stabilise a food web, damping the oscillations that strong links would drive (McCann, Hastings & Huxel 1998).
The Speelgoed says that more Greep slows the Van Motor’s pull (§III). May’s result does not contradict this; it concerns something else. Greep slows the steady drift toward Van. Strong, same-sign coupling amplifies shocks. Both can be true at once, and the Speelgoed already says as much: “A deep bond is not a safe one; it is a held one” (§III), and of Bloei, compounding mutual gain, “Bloei does not remove risk—it raises the stakes” (Lexicon). May’s limit makes this quantitative for many bonds at once: past σ·√(S·C) = 1, more binding means less stability. Grade: Constraint.
Ecologists describe a community by the effect each species has on each other’s growth. These effects come in signs: mutualism (+/+), competition (−/−), predation and parasitism (+/−), commensalism (+/0), and amensalism (−/0). The Speelgoed’s Trouw is “one value per Koppel”, and asymmetry enters “never through a split weight” (§II).
Mutualism and competition fit: both members share one sign. Predation and parasitism do not, because one member gains while the other loses. This is the kind of bond Allesina and Tang found to be the most stabilising (§2.5). The physical Octaven do not show it. There, Trouw is shared and symmetric, as §II says, through Onsager’s reciprocity, Newton’s third law, and the Hermitian coupling of quantum mechanics (Thermodynamic Octaaf §3.1; Cosmic Octaaf §2.2; Quantum Octaaf §2.5). Mixed signs first appear where living things consume each other. Grade: Correspondence, at this Octaaf (§4.1).
Many defended animals advertise it. Wasps and poison frogs are brightly coloured, and predators learn to avoid them. That is an honest signal, Bloot: the presented Eigen is the true one.
In Batesian mimicry, a harmless species copies the warning signal of a defended one. That is a Masker, a presented Eigen that differs from the true one. Its protection depends on predators’ experience. While the defended model is common, predators that sample the signal mostly learn to avoid it, and the mimic is protected. When mimics become common, predators that test the signal often find it hollow, and the protection weakens (Ruxton, Sherratt & Speed 2004). This is the Speelgoed’s account of a bluff: “a bluff is cheap exactly because it is hollow, and it holds only until a commitment is demanded that the true Eigen must actually make” (§VII). Here the commitment is a predator’s bite.
In Müllerian mimicry, two defended species share one warning signal. Neither is lying, and they share the cost of teaching predators. That is not a Masker but two Bloot signals that agree. Grade: Correspondence.
The Speelgoed’s Parasiet is “A node that maintains a permanent Masker to simulate positive Trouw, while its Waarneming treats the host as a resource” (Lexicon). The common cuckoo lays its eggs in other birds’ nests. In many host populations its eggs closely resemble the host’s own, which is a Masker on the egg. Hosts that detect odd eggs reject them. That is the commitment test of §XVI, and the arms race between egg mimicry and egg rejection has been traced in detail (Davies 2015).
The chick’s trick is subtler. A reed warbler parent adjusts its feeding to two signals from its brood: the visual display of gaping mouths and the begging calls. A single cuckoo chick shows far less gape than a full brood, and makes up for it with exaggerated calling. This makes the host feed it as much as a whole brood (Kilner, Noble & Davies 1999). The cuckoo does not imitate the host’s chicks. It plays on the host’s rule for reading need. In Speelgoed terms it works less through a Masker than through the host’s Waarneming, the filter through which the host reads its partner. The Lexicon says the Parasiet “Collapses into Schok upon exposure”, and hosts that detect a parasite abandon or reject it. Grade: Correspondence (measured).
§VI: “a Vonk can release more Energie than the existing members’ Koppel can absorb, and that excess reaches its own Drempel and becomes a new Solo”, and the new Solo “immediately forms its own Relatie with whatever produced it”. Life-history theory describes how organisms divide their resources between maintenance, growth and reproduction. Reproduction is funded from what remains beyond maintenance, under trade-offs that shape every species’ life cycle (Stearns 1992). The offspring is a new Solo born from surplus. In many species it is bound from birth to its parents by care. Grade: Correspondence.
§V.2: “A stable group, once bound, can act as a Solo inside a larger relationship with something else entirely.” The most dramatic instance in biology is endosymbiosis. The mitochondria in every animal and plant cell descend from bacteria that came to live inside another cell (Sagan 1967; published under the name later changed to Margulis). The partnership became a new kind of cell. The former partner still carries a small genome of its own, a trace of its independent past inside a body that now acts as one. Grade: Correspondence.
The lichen as a Trio. For about 150 years, lichens were described as a partnership of two: a fungus and a photosynthetic alga. In 2016, many common lichens were found to include a third partner, a yeast living in the outer layer (Spribille et al. 2016). A later survey of 339 lichen species found that this yeast is not present in all lichens (Lendemer et al. 2019). Where it is present, the lichen is a Trio. And for a century and a half the boundary had been drawn around two members when there were three, the case §VI describes: when a bond looks incomplete, “the boundary was drawn wrong”.
A caution. The partnership between most land plants and root fungi, mycorrhiza, is well established (Smith & Read 2008). The popular picture of a “wood wide web”, through which trees share resources and warnings and “mother trees” nurture their young, is not. A review found that positive claims about such networks have been increasingly cited beyond what the evidence supports, and concluded that knowledge of them is too sparse and unsettled to guide forest management (Karst, Jones & Hoeksema 2023). An ecological Koppel is not demonstrated by a good story.
Keystones. When the starfish Pisaster was removed from a rocky shore, mussels took over and the number of species fell sharply (Paine 1966). Some members hold a community together far out of proportion to their numbers.
A cascade across ecosystems. Sea otters eat sea urchins, and urchins eat kelp. Where otters are present, kelp forests stand. Where they are absent, urchins strip the seabed bare (Estes & Palmisano 1974). In the 1990s, otter numbers in western Alaska collapsed. The cause was killer whales, oceanic predators that had begun to eat them. Urchins boomed, and kelp forests were lost (Estes et al. 1998). That is Doem as the Speelgoed describes it, a cascade rather than a fading. It also illustrates §VI’s boundary rule. The killer whales had been treated as outside the nearshore system. They were part of the bond all along, and “the boundary was drawn wrong”.
Coextinction. When a species is lost, the parasites and mutualists that depend on it are lost with it. One estimate puts thousands of such dependent species at risk alongside the endangered hosts they rely on (Koh et al. 2004). Doem spreads along the bonds.
Grade: Correspondence (measured).
§VI says an Echo outlives its Koppel permanently and becomes “progressively more a record of the mourner than of the departed”. In Central American forests, some trees bear large, hard fruits with no animal now living there to disperse them well. Their likely partners were gomphotheres, ground sloths and other large mammals that went extinct about ten thousand years ago (Janzen & Martin 1982). Later analysis of fruits across the Americas supports and refines the idea that many plants still carry traits shaped by vanished megafauna (Guimarães, Galetti & Jordano 2008). The partner is gone. Its Echo remains in the survivor’s form, an “evolutionary anachronism”. Grade: Correspondence.
The idea has a famous warning attached. Connell named the “ghost of competition past”, the idea that species’ present traits were shaped by competitors no longer present. He warned that it is easy to invoke and hard to test (Connell 1980). The Speelgoed says the same about Rouw: “with the partner gone, there is nothing left to compare against” (§VII). Rouw is real, and it is also the place where explanations are least checkable.
Diepte is “the accumulated composite of everything a system has ever heard” (§II). Ecosystems carry such a composite. A forest’s growth this year depends not only on this year’s rain but on a weighted history of rain, drought and disturbance over previous years. Ecologists quantify this “ecological memory” with models that weight antecedent conditions over time (Ogle et al. 2015). That weighted integral of the past is Diepte, at the scale of a forest. Grade: Correspondence.
Studying the fossil record, Van Valen found that within a group of related species, the probability of extinction is roughly constant, independent of how long a species or genus has already existed. Old lineages are no safer than young ones (Van Valen 1973). His explanation was the Red Queen: every species evolves against others that are themselves evolving, so each must keep changing just to hold its place.
Two Speelgoed rules appear here:
The law holds approximately and is still debated in its details (Solé 2022). Grade: Correspondence, with a constraint discussed in §4.3.
After habitat is destroyed, species do not all disappear at once. Some persist for generations in the remaining fragments and are lost later, an “extinction debt” that is already owed (Tilman et al. 1994). This is §VIII.1’s stable orbit as “a configuration the Van Motor is winning against slowly enough that the orbit outlasts the span in which it is watched”. The fall has been decided, and only its timing remains. Grade: Correspondence.
§III says every Octaaf rests on a God that is fully Vol, a Godin that is fully Leeg, and the Medium their union sustains. “No God stands alone.”
The producers themselves depend on Sol, a God of a lower Octaaf (Thermodynamic Octaaf §3.11). Grade: Correspondence.
4.1 Mixed-sign bonds (§II). Kept at this Octaaf. Predation and parasitism are +/− bonds: one partner gains, the other loses (§3.1). The physical Octaven confirm the Speelgoed’s shared, symmetric Trouw, and the mixed sign begins here. Behaviour that first appears at one Octaaf is recorded at that Octaaf, not in the Speelgoed. At this Octaaf, the natural reading is that Trouw is the shared strength of a coupling, and the opposite signs are the direction of Energie flow along it. What the predator gains, the prey loses, which is the Telraam’s own accounting.
4.2 Greep and stability (§III). Constraint. More binding slows the Van Motor’s drift but can destabilise against shocks (§2.5). Exponential protection holds only against independent shocks to members, not against shocks shared by all (§2.3). The Speelgoed’s existing lines (“A deep bond is not a safe one”, and of Bloei, “raises the stakes”) already point this way. This Octaaf makes them quantitative.
4.3 Accumulated Gewenning versus constant extinction risk (§VIII.1; §3.9). Open. In the Speelgoed, Gewenning accumulates over a bond’s life and raises Trouw, and so Greep. Van Valen’s law finds no protection accumulating with a lineage’s age. One reconciliation is the Red Queen itself: if every partner and enemy is also evolving, a lineage’s binding relative to its environment does not grow, however long it lasts. That reconciliation is plausible but untested in Speelgoed terms.
4.4 The Marge and the Medium’s noise (Lexicon). Constraint. A Marge prevents flicker only when it is wide compared with the Medium’s disturbances (§2.2).
The ecological Octaaf is where the Speelgoed’s bonds take living form. Its thresholds and hysteresis are measured in whole lakes, with flicker and slowing before the fall. Its Van Motor sets how long a population survives, and shared hardship weakens the protection that numbers give. Greep among members of one species is the difference between growth and collapse. Its Masker and Parasiet are evolved strategies, with costs that rise when the bluff is tested. Its Doem cascades from killer whales to kelp, and its Rouw is a fruit still shaped for an animal ten thousand years gone.
Two findings go beyond the Speelgoed as written. Bonds between living things can carry opposite signs, a behaviour that begins at this Octaaf and is recorded here; the physical Octaven keep Trouw shared. And past a certain density of links, more binding means less stability. Both are reported here rather than smoothed over.
That is the how. The why is for the Speelgoed to say.
Allesina, S., & Tang, S. (2012). Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature, 483, 205-208.
Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2011). Early warnings of regime shifts: A whole-ecosystem experiment. Science, 332(6033), 1079-1082. doi:10.1126/science.1203672
Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., & Vitousek, P. M. (2011). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Connell, J. H. (1980). Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos, 35, 131-138.
Courchamp, F., Clutton-Brock, T., & Grenfell, B. (1999). Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(10), 405-410. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01683-3
Davies, N. B. (2015). Cuckoo: Cheating by Nature. London: Bloomsbury.
Drake, J. M., & Griffen, B. D. (2010). Early warning signals of extinction in deteriorating environments. Nature, 467(7314), 456-459.
Estes, J. A., & Palmisano, J. F. (1974). Sea otters: Their role in structuring nearshore communities. Science, 185(4156), 1058-1060.
Estes, J. A., Tinker, M. T., Williams, T. M., & Doak, D. F. (1998). Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science, 282(5388), 473-476.
Guimarães, P. R., Galetti, M., & Jordano, P. (2008). Seed dispersal anachronisms: Rethinking the fruits extinct megafauna ate. PLoS ONE, 3(3), e1745.
Janzen, D. H., & Martin, P. S. (1982). Neotropical anachronisms: The fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science, 215, 19-27.
Karst, J., Jones, M. D., & Hoeksema, J. D. (2023). Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7, 501-511. doi:10.1038/s41559-023-01986-1
Kilner, R. M., Noble, D. G., & Davies, N. B. (1999). Signals of need in parent-offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature, 397, 667-672.
Koh, L. P., et al. (2004). Species coextinctions and the biodiversity crisis. Science, 305(5690), 1632-1634. doi:10.1126/science.1101101
Kramer, A. M., Dennis, B., Liebhold, A. M., & Drake, J. M. (2009). The evidence for Allee effects. Population Ecology, 51(3), 341-354. doi:10.1007/s10144-009-0152-6
Lande, R. (1993). Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. The American Naturalist, 142, 911-927.
Lendemer, J. C., Keepers, K. G., Tripp, E. A., Pogoda, C. S., McCain, C. M., & Kane, N. C. (2019). A taxonomically broad metagenomic survey of 339 species spanning 57 families suggests cystobasidiomycete yeasts are not ubiquitous across all lichens. American Journal of Botany, 106(8), 1090-1095.
May, R. M. (1972). Will a large complex system be stable? Nature, 238, 413-414.
May, R. M. (1977). Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature, 269, 471-477.
McCann, K., Hastings, A., & Huxel, G. R. (1998). Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature, 395, 794-798.
Ogle, K., et al. (2015). Quantifying ecological memory in plant and ecosystem processes. Ecology Letters, 18(3), 221-235. doi:10.1111/ele.12399
Paine, R. T. (1966). Food web complexity and species diversity. The American Naturalist, 100(910), 65-75.
Ruxton, G. D., Sherratt, T. N., & Speed, M. P. (2004). Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sagan, L. [later Margulis] (1967). On the origin of mitosing cells. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 14(3), 255-274.
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413(6856), 591-596. doi:10.1038/35098000
Scheffer, M., et al. (2009). Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature, 461, 53-59. doi:10.1038/nature08227
Smith, S. E., & Read, D. J. (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.
Solé, R. (2022). Revisiting Leigh Van Valen’s “A New Evolutionary Law” (1973). Biological Theory, 17, 120-125.
Spribille, T., et al. (2016). Basidiomycete yeasts in the cortex of ascomycete macrolichens. Science, 353(6298), 488-492.
Stearns, S. C. (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L., & Nowak, M. A. (1994). Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371(6492), 65-66.
Van Valen, L. (1973). A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory, 1, 1-30.
Wang, R., Dearing, J. A., Langdon, P. G., Zhang, E., Yang, X., Dakos, V., & Scheffer, M. (2012). Flickering gives early warning signals of a critical transition to a eutrophic lake state. Nature, 492, 419-422. doi:10.1038/nature11655