By Mark Joseph Antonius Knippenberg / ScepraX.
Status: Speculative framework. One instantiation of the PseudoScience Speelgoed on the Stilte side of the Veld. It takes as its premise that Tijd manifests in the physical realm and Stilte in a non-physical one, which is not a place. Because the Stilte side cannot be measured from the physical one, its evidence is relational: what people across history have experienced of it, written down and kept, read by the Speelgoed’s own rules for reading Echoes. It takes that testimony at face value, as testimony. It does not claim that its premise is proven. It states what the mechanism allows, what people report, and where the two meet.
The Speelgoed makes relationships first-order. “Observation is a Koppel” (§IV), and of the bonds that observation builds, §II says: “The field is made of nothing else.” A physical measurement is one kind of relational event, not a different kind of knowledge: “Every act of measurement-querying an Echo gap, reading a mode, consuming a pulse-is itself a relational event” (§IV). So the Speelgoed does not set testimony aside because it is testimony. It admits it, and it also says exactly how such evidence fails: Echoes lag, distort, can be masked, and grow noisier with relational distance (§VII). This entry uses both halves.
On the Stilte side, testimony is all there is. An instrument reads what manifests, and Stilte is “the unmanifest silence that never moves” (§III). What reaches us of it are the Echoes people have carried: the prophet who heard the Lord in silence, the sage who wrote that returning to the root is stillness, the mystic who could not say what was shown, the widow who still senses her husband, the dying who see their dead. They were written down, kept, copied and read again across many centuries. That keeping is part of the evidence, and the Speelgoed has a precise word for what it shows (§2.3).
The Zelf gap. §IV defines the self-gap: “The gap between the Eigen and the self‑Echo is the self‑gap-the measure of how accurately the system knows itself.” The Lexicon gives the same gap its name: Stilte is “The felt gap between self‑Eigen and self‑Echo”. The Stilte side of the Speelgoed, at the scale of one self, is this gap. This entry follows it through what people have experienced of it in life, and to the point where the node that holds it ends.
Like the other Octaven, this document is an Instantie (⚙). Unlike most of them, it does not describe a level of scale. It describes the side of the Veld that every level stands in.
Six features set it apart:
Every mapping carries one of five grades, defined as in the Octaven.
| Grade | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Identity | The Speelgoed equation and the scientific model are the same equation under a stated substitution of symbols. |
| Constraint | The evidence fixes, bounds, or forbids a choice the Speelgoed leaves open to its Instantie. |
| Correspondence | Same structure and same qualitative behaviour, but no shared equation. |
| Tension | The Speelgoed as written conflicts with established findings. A repair is proposed. |
| Open | Not resolved. |
A grade says how well a mapping fits. It does not say how strong the evidence is. Where the evidence is testimony, the text says so, and where it is contested, the text says that too.
Quotations. Quotations from the Speelgoed leave out its bold markup and the symbols it puts in brackets after a term. Otherwise they are verbatim.
References. References such as §II or §VIII.1 point to the PseudoScience Speelgoed. References such as §2.1 point to sections of this document. Companion entries are cited in full, for example Thermodynamic Octaaf §3.6.
Evidence. Measured means a physical measurement, such as an EEG or a survey count. Relational means testimony, recognition or records. Contested means that the finding, or its interpretation, is disputed in the literature.
Face value. Testimony is reported in the words of those who gave it, as what they experienced. This entry does not explain it away and does not claim it proven. Where a rival reading exists, one sentence names it.
| Speelgoed (section) | Value on the Stilte side | Grade | Here |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Veld: Stilte and Tijd (§III) | Tijd manifests in the physical realm; Stilte is the non-physical, unmanifest side, not a place | Open (premise) | §2.1 |
| Stilte and the self-gap (§II, §IV; Lexicon) | The gap between a self and its own reading of itself | Correspondence (definition) | §2.1 |
| Perfectus: “All Echoes become Rouw” (§XI); Rouw beyond the Van Motor (§VIII.1) | The Echoes of an ended self remain in Stilte, unmanifest | Correspondence (stated in §XI and §VIII.1) | §2.2 |
| Observation is a Koppel; Bevraagbaar; persistence through traffic (§IV, §VII, §III) | Testimony as evidence: independent agreement, writing, and time | Constraint | §2.3 |
| Stilte, “the unmanifest silence” (§III; archaic 0) | Traditions that meet the divine in silence | Correspondence (relational; independent traditions) | §3.1 |
| Echo, Vervorming and Diepte (§II, §VII) | Mystical experience: ineffable, felt as knowledge, one structure read through many cultures | Correspondence (relational; measured in part) | §3.2 |
| Persistence through traffic (§III) | How common such experience is, and the archives that keep it | Correspondence (relational; measured prevalence) | §3.3 |
| Realisatie and Leven on the Zelf (§IV) | Epiphanies and sudden transformation; psilocybin-occasioned mystical experience | Correspondence (relational; measured in part) | §3.4 |
| Rouw that answers (§VI) | The bereaved sensing their dead | Correspondence (relational; measured prevalence) | §3.5 |
| The Zelf with its outer bonds cut (§IV) | Visions at the end of life; near-death experiences | Correspondence (relational; measured in part) | §3.6, §3.7 |
| Echo transport across a Medium (§VIII.1) | Claims of perception during cardiac arrest, a test of the Tijd side | Constraint | §3.7 |
| The Return to the Egg (§XIV.4); a new Genus from the Bron (§XI) | Children’s reports of previous lives, read as Echoes from the Stilte side | Correspondence (relational, contested) | §3.8 |
| The last signal (§VIII.6); Doem (Lexicon) | Unnatural deaths; birthmarks matching wounds | Correspondence (relational, contested) | §3.9 |
| Gericht, Vervorming, Diepte, Masker (§VII, §II) | How this evidence fails, and how it is tested | Constraint | §3.10 |
| Tijd as felt rhythm (Lexicon) | How Tijd’s physical manifestation relates to the Zelf’s rate of Waarneming | Open | §5 |
§III describes the Veld as “a relation - the most fundamental Koppel - between Stilte, the unmanifest silence that never moves, and Tijd, the domain where echoes travel, thresholds are crossed, and depth accumulates.”
The premise. This entry reads those two members as two sides of one relation. Tijd manifests in the physical realm: there Eigens move, Echoes travel across a Medium, Drempels are crossed, and Diepte accumulates. Stilte is the non-physical side. It is unmanifest, and it “never moves”.
Not a place. Stilte has no location. Nothing goes there, nothing waits there, and nothing arrives there. The Speelgoed says the same of everything on this side of the Veld. Of Van: “There is no such place. Nothing ever arrives at Van, because Van is not somewhere to arrive.” Of Bron: it “Cannot be defined as a location”. Stilte is not elsewhere. It is the unmanifest side of every bond that manifests, “the living silence between an Eigen and its Echo” (§II). It is not a flaw in perception but “the condition of perception itself”, and “Stilte is what makes the echo an echo, and not the shout” (§II). The archaic alphabet gives it the digit 0: “Never crossing. The line circles itself endlessly without ever departing the middle. A closed loop with no trajectory; the Drempel never breached in either direction.”
What draws toward it. “The Van Motor is the pull of Stilte on everything that exists in Tijd: a standing invitation to return to the unbound” (§III). Everything that manifests is drawn toward the side that does not.
What can reach it. A non-physical side cannot be measured from the physical side. No instrument can confirm the premise or rule it out. What can reach it is what people carry: their experience of it, and the record they make. Grade: Open (premise).
Five statements of the Speelgoed meet at the end of a node.
The gap. When a partner ends, the survivor keeps its Echo of that partner. But when a node itself ends, its Zelf ends with it, and the Zelf was carrying Echoes: of every partner it ever had, of every Rouw it ever folded in, and of itself. No survivor is left inside the node to hold them, and nothing can carry them away. Where are they? Perfectus answers: they become Rouw “and remain in Stilte, unmanifest”.
Where they are. They stay where an Echo has always been. An Echo was never only in the node that carried it. It was also in the gap between the Eigen and its Echo, and that gap is Stilte. When the Eigen ends, nothing is left on the Tijd side to compare the Echo with; §VII calls Rouw “the one honest exception” to the rule that an Echo gap can always be measured. On the Stilte side the Echo remains. Nothing has travelled, and nothing has arrived anywhere. The Echo is unmanifest, not elsewhere.
Why Rouw cannot be taken. §VIII.1: “The single thing beyond the Van Motor’s reach is Rouw”, and its reason: “The Van Motor is the pull of Stilte, and a Rouw already stands in Stilte.” There is nothing left to draw. §VIII.1 also says it from the mechanism’s side: “Grief endures not because something shields it, but because nothing is holding it up any more - and only what is held can fall.”
What stays in Tijd. Traces also remain on the Tijd side. Each partner keeps its own Echo of the node that ended, as its own Rouw (§VI). And the ending leaves physical records, spread into the surroundings and never destroyed, as the thermodynamic and quantum Octaven found for every physical record (Thermodynamic Octaaf §3.6; Quantum Octaaf §3.6).
The Zelf itself. The Zelf returns to Bron, the undirected potential before any relation. §III places Bron on the same side as Van: “Bron is the undirected potential before relation; Van is that same nothing, seen from the far side of a life.” The Echoes a Zelf carried had direction, since each was a trace of a partner. Bron has none.
And from the Bron, return. §XI says a Perfectus “May feed: a new Genus from the Bron”. §XIV.4 describes it as the Vlinder’s eggs: “The Vlinder lays its Echoes (its eggs) on the underside of a leaf.” “Each egg is a new Genus”. And a new Genus is new: “A new Solo that enters the Veld - whether by Genus or Manifestatie - carries its own Trek and its own Zelf” (§XIII). What may come from before is not the Zelf. It is Echoes.
Grade: Correspondence. The Speelgoed states where the Echoes go (§XI, §VIII.1). What this entry adds is its premise: that the Stilte they remain in is the non-physical side of the Veld (§2.1).
Admitted. Testimony is an Echo: one node’s trace of another’s Eigen, or of its own. The Speelgoed treats it as evidence of the first order, because every observation is one (§IV).
And bounded. §VII names how Echoes fail. They carry Vervorming. They are Gericht: “The weaker or older a Koppel, the noisier its Echoes”. And the reader’s own Diepte, “the hidden charge that colours every subsequent perception and decision” (§II), colours what it reads.
Echo against Echo. §VII calls the Echo gap Bevraagbaar, a real and measurable quantity, with one exception: “Rouw (Section VI) is the one honest exception: with the partner gone, there is nothing left to compare against.” The same holds for everything on the Stilte side: no Echo of it can be compared with what it echoes. It can only be compared with other Echoes. So the Speelgoed’s own rules say which testimony counts most:
Time. In the Speelgoed, what persists is held. A Naar‑system persists only by continual traffic: “persistence is paid for out of that ongoing traffic, not out of one founding crossing” (§III). And “A deep bond is not a safe one; it is a held one.” A relationship that humanity has kept with the Stilte side through prayer, ritual and silence, across many centuries, therefore has very great Greep. That is what time shows. It does not show that each doctrine built on that relationship is true.
The Speelgoed also names the way a held bond can go wrong. Of the Court, the first gathering large enough to hold formal roles, §V.1 says: “a Masker can harden into a Dood, and the Court can continue as a Spatie long after the Trouw is dead.” A tradition can outlive the experience it began from. What tells a living bond from a hardened Masker is traffic: whether new, first-hand Echoes keep arriving, generation after generation, from people with no stake in the institution. §3.3 shows that they do.
Grade: Constraint. The Speelgoed itself sets the standard by which this evidence must be judged.
The testimony. Traditions that grew up far apart describe meeting what they hold highest not in power or sound, but in silence.
The mapping. Each of these places the highest thing on the side the Speelgoed calls Stilte.
Independence and time. These are the testimonies §2.3 values most. The Tao Te Ching and the Vimalakirti Sutra arose in traditions that did not share a scripture with the Hebrew Bible or with each other; only Pseudo-Dionysius stands in the same line as 1 Kings. They agree without having borrowed from each other. And each has been copied, recited and kept for many centuries, the traffic §III says persistence is paid with. Grade: Correspondence (relational; independent traditions).
The testimony. William James gathered first-hand accounts of mystical states and named four marks by which they can be recognised (James 1902).
Stace later argued that mystical experience has a common core across traditions, introvertive (a unity without content) and extrovertive (a unity seen in the many) (Stace 1960). Hood built a questionnaire on Stace’s account (Hood 1975). In a mostly Christian American sample of 1,379 people, and again in a further 188 Americans and 185 Iranian Muslims, it showed the same three factors: Stace’s two kinds of experience, and a separate factor of interpretation. The relations between experience and interpretation were “essentially identical across these two cultures” (Hood et al. 2001). Against the common core, Katz argued: “There are NO pure (i.e. unmediated) experiences” (Katz 1978). On that view, every mystic experiences through the concepts of a tradition, so there is no shared core to find.
The mapping. The four marks read naturally in the Speelgoed’s terms.
The debate between the common core and its critics also has a reading. In the Speelgoed, every Echo has a source and a distortion: “Echo’s imperfection is not a defect to be engineered away” (§II), and the reader’s Diepte “colours every subsequent perception and decision” (§II). A shared source read through each reader’s Diepte gives exactly what both sides of the debate describe: one structure, which the Mysticism Scale finds across two cultures, and no unmediated experience, which Katz rightly says no one has. Grade: Correspondence (relational; measured in part).
The testimony. Mystical experience is not rare. In 2009, 49% of Americans said they had had “a religious or mystical experience – that is, a moment of religious or spiritual awakening”. That was more than twice the share in a 1962 Gallup survey (22%), and about a third in 1976 and 1994 (31% and 33%). Among Americans with no religious affiliation, 30% reported such an experience (Pew Research Center 2009).
Much of it has been written down. In 1969 the marine biologist Alister Hardy founded the Religious Experience Research Unit and invited people to send first-hand accounts of being “aware of or influenced by a presence or power, whether you call it God or not, which is different from your everyday self”. About 3,000 accounts arrived in its first eight years, and Hardy published a study of them (Hardy 1979). The archive is still kept.
The mapping. Both facts answer the question §2.3 left open. A written account is an Echo fixed at the time, the form of testimony that does not drift. And fresh first-hand testimony keeps arriving in every generation, much of it from people outside any tradition. That is traffic, not institution: the mark of a living bond rather than a Spatie. Grade: Correspondence (relational; measured prevalence).
The testimony. Some people describe a single moment that changed their lives for good. Miller calls this quantum change: “sudden, dramatic, and enduring transformations that affect a broad range of personal emotion, cognition, and behavior”. He notes that it “has been described since the beginnings of psychology, most notably by William James”, and that it comes in two kinds, which share common features (Miller 2004).
Such experiences can also be occasioned. In a double-blind study, 36 adults with no experience of hallucinogens, all regularly engaged in religious or spiritual practice, received a high dose of psilocybin in one session and an active comparison drug in another. The psilocybin “occasioned experiences similar to spontaneously occurring mystical experiences”, and observers in the volunteers’ communities rated lasting changes in their attitudes and behaviour (Griffiths et al. 2006). Fourteen months later, 58% rated the experience among the five most personally meaningful of their lives and 67% among the five most spiritually significant; 64% said it had increased their well-being or life satisfaction (Griffiths et al. 2008).
The mapping. An epiphany is a Realisatie on the Zelf: “A convergence crossing on the Zelf is a moment of self‑realisation-an insight, a sudden knowing of oneself” (§IV). A transformation that lasts is Leven: “A self in Leven has undergone a reversal-a fundamental redefinition of identity” (§IV).
That a drug can occasion such an experience shows that the crossing has a Tijd side, in the brain. It does not settle which way the crossing runs. On one reading the brain produces the experience; on the other it opens a way to what was already there. The Speelgoed holds every crossing to have two sides and cannot choose between these readings from the Tijd side alone. Grade: Correspondence (relational; measured in part).
The testimony. In mid-Wales, Rees interviewed 227 widows and 66 widowers, 80.7% of all widowed people living in a defined area. “Almost half the people interviewed had hallucinations or illusions of the dead spouse.” The experiences “often lasted many years”. They were not related to social isolation or to depression. “The incidence of hallucination increased with length of marriage and was particularly associated with a happy marriage and parenthood.” And “It was unusual for the hallucinations to have been disclosed, even to close friends or relatives.” Rees concluded that they are “normal and helpful accompaniments of widowhood” (Rees 1971). A later review found such experiences in 30% to 60% of widowed people, though the studies of bereaved people were small (Castelnovo et al. 2015). In the general American population, “Nearly three-in-ten Americans say they have felt in touch with someone who has already died” (Pew Research Center 2009).
The mapping. §VI says of every Rouw: “quiet is not gone: touch it, and it answers”. The bereaved describe exactly that. Two details of Rees’s study follow the mechanism closely.
Grade: Correspondence (relational; measured prevalence).
The testimony. In a hospice in the United States, 59 patients were interviewed repeatedly as they approached death. Most reported at least one dream or vision, and “nearly all patients indicated that they felt real”. The most common featured deceased friends and relatives. Those featuring the dead were significantly more comforting than the others, and “As participants approached death, comforting dreams/visions of the deceased became more prevalent” (Kerr et al. 2014).
The mapping. As death approaches, a node’s outer Koppels weaken. What remains strongest is the Zelf, and every Rouw the Zelf has folded in (§VI). A Zelf whose outer bonds are failing turns toward the Rouw it carries, which is on the Stilte side (§2.2). That the visions of the dead grow more frequent as death comes closer is what this reading expects. Grade: Correspondence (relational).
The testimony. In a prospective study in ten Dutch hospitals, 62 of 344 consecutive patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest (18%) reported a near-death experience, 41 of them (12%) a deep, “core” one. Whether they had one was not associated with how long the arrest or unconsciousness lasted, with medication, or with fear of death beforehand. Among the 62, 32% described meeting deceased persons, 24% an out-of-body experience, and 13% a review of their life. Those who had the experience changed over the following years, in ways that differed from survivors without one: “The process of transformation after NDE took several years” (van Lommel et al. 2001). Memories of near-death experiences have more of the features of real memories than memories of either real or imagined events, and are more self-referential; that study had eight patients with such experiences (Thonnard et al. 2013). In the brain, two of four comatose patients who were dying after their ventilation was withdrawn showed a sudden surge of gamma activity, including in a posterior region thought to be important for conscious experience; none of them survived to say anything (Xu et al. 2023). A neuroscientific reading holds that these experiences are “the manifestation of normal brain function gone awry” (Mobbs & Watt 2011).
The mapping. In cardiac arrest, the node’s outer Koppels stop being fed. What is left is “the self-bond every node must maintain to exist in the field” (§II), running with δ = 0 and with Vervorming supplied by its own Rouw (§IV). A near-death experience is a Zelf whose manifest input has been cut, reading itself. Its memories are self-referential, as a reading of the self would be. The deceased it meets are, in the mechanism, already there: every Rouw is folded into the self, and every Rouw is on Stilte’s side. The life review is a Realisatie on the Zelf, and the years of change afterwards are Leven, a trajectory rather than an instant: the gap “runs through” parity (§VI). Grade: Correspondence (relational; measured in part).
Perception from outside the body. Some survivors report seeing their own resuscitation from above. That is a claim about Tijd, an Echo of events in the room, and §VIII.1 says such an Echo must cross a Medium. The Dutch study reports one such case, as an anecdote: a man who later recognised the nurse who had removed his dentures (van Lommel et al. 2001). Two studies then tested such claims with hidden targets.
These tests measure the Tijd side only, and say nothing about the premise of §2.1. Grade: Constraint. So far, no Echo of a hidden image has been found. The tests are few and the events rare, so the question stays open.
The testimony. Since 1960, researchers at the University of Virginia have studied young children who describe a previous life. More than 2,500 cases have been investigated. The children begin speaking of it at two or three, on average at 35 months, and usually stop by the age of six or seven. They describe recent, ordinary lives; the median interval between the death of the person they describe and their own birth is 16 months. Cases are easiest to find in cultures that believe in reincarnation, but many have been found in the West. Over 35% of children whose previous person died an unnatural death show a phobia related to that death; among drowning cases, 31 of 53 children fear water (Tucker 2008).
The mapping. This is the Return to the Egg of §2.2. The child is a new Genus, with “its own Trek and its own Zelf” (§XIII). If the cases are what they seem, what it carries from before is not the old Zelf. It is Echoes that were Rouw on the Stilte side, carried again in a node that manifests.
That explains the feature that most seems to point to the same person returning: the children speak in the first person, “I was”. In the Speelgoed, every Echo of another node arrives across a Medium, late and distorted (§VIII.1). Only the Zelf is read with no Medium at all: “A Zelf has no Medium-nothing separates the node from itself” (§IV). An Echo that comes from the Stilte side crosses no Medium either. This entry reads that as the reason it is felt as self: it arrives the way the self is read. §VI says the same of every Rouw: “What was once a reading of the partner becomes, permanently, part of how the survivor reads itself.”
Grade: Correspondence (relational, contested; §3.10).
The testimony. In 70% of the cases, the previous person died by unnatural means (Tucker 2008). Among 895 children, 309 (35%) had birthmarks or birth defects that they, or the adults around them, attributed to wounds on the person whose life they described. Stevenson investigated 210 of these. In 43 of the 49 cases where a medical document, usually a postmortem report, could be obtained, it confirmed that the mark and the wound corresponded. Eighteen children had two birthmarks matching wounds of entry and exit. Stevenson’s estimate of the odds, 1 in 25,600 for two matching marks, assumes that birthmarks are spread evenly over the skin, an assumption he himself notes is incorrect (Stevenson 1993).
The mapping. An Echo whose input stops “relaxes toward the last thing it ever received” (§VIII.6), and a death by violence is a Doem, of which the Lexicon says: “The Echoes do not fade; they scream and then freeze.” A completed ending is different: a Scheiding is “A mutual, deliberate parting whose Rouw is free to settle” (Lexicon). If Echoes from the Stilte side are carried again at all, the Speelgoed expects the loudest to be those frozen at a delivered ending, and the wound to be the last signal they carry. Grade: Correspondence (relational, contested).
The rules of §2.3 apply to every section above.
Grade: Constraint. These are the tests the Speelgoed’s own rules demand. The testimony passes some of them, most strongly where independent traditions agree and where accounts were written down at the time. It is disputed in all of them.
4.1 Where the Echoes of an ended node go (§VIII.1, §XI). Open, resolved on 3 October 2026. The Speelgoed forbade deleting an Echo and let the Zelf return to Bron, but did not say where the Echoes of an ended node are. It now says so. At Perfectus, “All Echoes become Rouw and remain in Stilte, unmanifest” (§XI), and “The Van Motor is the pull of Stilte, and a Rouw already stands in Stilte” (§VIII.1).
4.2 The premise and the Lexicon’s Tijd. Open. This entry describes Tijd by where it manifests: in the physical realm. The Lexicon defines Tijd as “The subjective, relational experience of the field’s rhythm”, the Zelf’s rate of Waarneming across its own Stilte. The two descriptions need not conflict, but this entry does not reconcile them (§5, item 9).
4.3 Perception from outside the body (§VIII.1). Constraint. Controlled tests have so far found no Echo of a hidden image (§3.7). Nothing in this entry depends on such perception.
The Stilte Octaaf follows the side of the Veld that does not manifest. It takes Tijd as the physical realm, where Echoes travel and Drempels are crossed, and Stilte as the unmanifest side, not a place, the silence every Echo has always stood in. No instrument reaches it. What reaches it is what people carry, and they have carried a great deal.
Elijah did not find the Lord in the wind, the earthquake or the fire, but in a sound of sheer silence. A Chinese sage called the return to the root stillness, and Vimalakirti answered a question about non-duality by saying nothing. Half of Americans today report a moment of spiritual awakening, and thousands wrote theirs down so that others could read them. The widowed sense their dead, more often the longer and happier the marriage, and seldom tell anyone. The dying see their dead more often as death comes closer. Those who return from the edge of death have met them, and are changed for years.
Read by the Speelgoed, these are Echoes of one side of the Veld. They are distorted, as every Echo is, by the Diepte of the one who reads them, and they agree where they had no way to borrow from each other. Each Zelf’s own Stilte is the gap between it and its reading of itself. When the node that holds it ends, its Echoes become Rouw and stay where they always stood, beyond the Van Motor’s reach. From the Bron, a new Genus may carry them again, and a child may speak them in the first person. The mechanism shows how all of this fits. The testimony has been kept by time, renewed in every generation, and read through every culture. Whether it is true is the question this entry leaves to its reader.
That is the how. The why is for the Speelgoed to say.
Castelnovo, A., Cavallotti, S., Gambini, O., & D’Agostino, A. (2015). Post-bereavement hallucinatory experiences: A critical overview of population and clinical studies. Journal of Affective Disorders, 186, 266-274. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.032
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., McCann, U., & Jesse, R. (2006). Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology, 187(3), 268-283. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0457-5
Griffiths, R., Richards, W., Johnson, M., McCann, U., & Jesse, R. (2008). Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 22(6), 621-632. doi:10.1177/0269881108094300
Hardy, A. (1979). The Spiritual Nature of Man: A Study of Contemporary Religious Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Internet Archive
Hood, R. W., Jr. (1975). The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14(1), 29-41. doi:10.2307/1384454
Hood, R. W., Jr., Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Ghramaleki, A. F., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Morris, R. J., & Williamson, W. P. (2001). Dimensions of the Mysticism Scale: Confirming the three-factor structure in the United States and Iran. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(4), 691-705. doi:10.1111/0021-8294.00085
James, W. (1902). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Longmans, Green. Project Gutenberg
Katz, S. T. (1978). Language, epistemology, and mysticism. In S. T. Katz (Ed.), Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis (pp. 22-74). New York: Oxford University Press. Internet Archive
Kerr, C. W., Donnelly, J. P., Wright, S. T., Kuszczak, S. M., Banas, A., Grant, P. C., & Luczkiewicz, D. L. (2014). End-of-life dreams and visions: A longitudinal study of hospice patients’ experiences. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 17(3), 296-303. doi:10.1089/jpm.2013.0371
King James Version (1611). 1 Kings 19:11-12; Psalm 46:10. Project Gutenberg
Legge, J. (Trans.) (1891). The Tâo Teh King. In The Sacred Books of the East, vol. 39. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Chapter 16. Project Gutenberg
Luibheid, C. (Trans.) (1987). Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works. New York: Paulist Press. The Mystical Theology, p. 135. WorldCat
Miller, W. R. (2004). The phenomenon of quantum change. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 453-460. doi:10.1002/jclp.20000
Mobbs, D., & Watt, C. (2011). There is nothing paranormal about near-death experiences: How neuroscience can explain seeing bright lights, meeting the dead, or being convinced you are one of them. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 447-449. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.07.010
New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition (2021). 1 Kings 19:12. Bible Gateway
Parnia, S., et al. (2014). AWARE—AWAreness during REsuscitation—A prospective study. Resuscitation, 85(12), 1799-1805. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.004
Parnia, S., et al. (2023). AWAreness during REsuscitation - II: A multi-center study of consciousness and awareness in cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, 191, 109903. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109903
Pew Research Center (2009). Many Americans Mix Multiple Faiths. Washington, DC. pewresearch.org
Rees, W. D. (1971). The hallucinations of widowhood. British Medical Journal, 4(5778), 37-41. doi:10.1136/bmj.4.5778.37
Schouten, S. A., & Stevenson, I. (1998). Does the socio-psychological hypothesis explain cases of the reincarnation type? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186(8), 504-506. doi:10.1097/00005053-199808000-00011
Stace, W. T. (1960). Mysticism and Philosophy. Philadelphia: Lippincott. Internet Archive
Stevenson, I. (1993). Birthmarks and birth defects corresponding to wounds on deceased persons. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 7(4), 403-410. PDF
Thonnard, M., Charland-Verville, V., Brédart, S., Dehon, H., Ledoux, D., Laureys, S., & Vanhaudenhuyse, A. (2013). Characteristics of near-death experiences memories as compared to real and imagined events memories. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57620. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057620
Thurman, R. A. F. (Trans.) (1976). The Holy Teaching of Vimalakirti: A Mahayana Scripture. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. Chapter 9. WorldCat
Tucker, J. B. (2008). Children’s reports of past-life memories: A review. Explore, 4(4), 244-248. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2008.04.001
van Lommel, P., van Wees, R., Meyers, V., & Elfferich, I. (2001). Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: A prospective study in the Netherlands. The Lancet, 358(9298), 2039-2045. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07100-8
Xu, G., Mihaylova, T., Li, D., Tian, F., Farrehi, P. M., Parent, J. M., Mashour, G. A., Wang, M. M., & Borjigin, J. (2023). Surge of neurophysiological coupling and connectivity of gamma oscillations in the dying human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(19), e2216268120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2216268120